Inventory what exists. Govern what changes. Plan what moves to Tines.
SOAR Pack Guardian helps security leaders inventory existing automation, assess upgrade and dependency risk, evaluate migration paths into Tines, and produce stakeholder-ready evidence before production release.
Start with one pack, connector, integration, workflow, story, or version path. Review the output, then decide whether a deeper walkthrough is worth your time.
Pack governance, release-readiness evidence, and change approval context for XSOAR content.
Governance support for XSIAM-aligned pack, integration, and content update review.
Connector and app governance for Splunk SOAR teams reviewing drift, CVE exposure, and approval evidence.
Govern stories, actions, templates, resources, credentials, dependencies, and change evidence inside Tines.
Completed Tines migrated objects, Story counts, and remaining engineering effort clearly separated
SPG inventories Splunk SOAR or XSOAR source objects, estimates the total Tines Stories required before migration or purchase decisions, maps what can become Tines actions, resources, and templates, then separates assessment results from any separately scoped Tines object delivery.
Playbooks, integrations, scripts, variables, branches, and dependencies.
Quickly size the total number of Tines Stories required for conversion.
Completed Tines stories, actions, resources, templates, and review notes.
Evidence-led conversion planning in a fraction of the time.
Traffic-light review gates keep quality visible while SPG races source SOAR inventory toward reviewable Tines output in a fraction of the time.
A simple, executive-safe view of process, scope, Story count, and results
Same-day evaluation results for Tines Conversion
The model shows the high-level path from Splunk SOAR or XSOAR source inventory to total Tines Story sizing, conversion cost estimates, mapped objects, blockers, level of effort, and an organization-ready assessment before a customer commits to migration or purchases Tines. If the decision is to migrate, the mapped Tines objects can be created as a separately scoped follow-on deliverable.
- SecOps: a normalized inventory of packs and components by environment
- DevSecOps / QA: CVE and compatibility checks mapped to release targets
- Release Engineering: clear go or no-go signals and break-fix likelihood
- Platform Engineering: alert routing and workflow configuration by instance
- GRC / Internal Audit: evidence trails for controls, approvals, and remediation
- Leadership: a stakeholder-ready summary of risk, effort, and timing
Four ways to use SPG without mixing the message
Each lane uses the same evidence discipline, but the business outcome is different: baseline the environment, approve a change, plan a Tines migration, or run continuous governance.
Create a clear view of playbooks, integrations, packs, connectors, stories, actions, versions, and dependencies.
Review upgrade, CVE, break/fix, compatibility, dependency, and approval evidence before changes move forward.
Map XSOAR or Splunk SOAR workflows into a normalized model, create reviewable Tines drafts, and show what needs engineering work.
Track usage, findings, evidence exports, stakeholder reports, and recurring controls across teams and environments.
Clear value by organization type
Adopt the same platform at the maturity level that fits your team today.
Start with a focused single pack analysis before committing to a full implementation or demo cycle.
Identify where pack drift, vulnerable integrations, and approval evidence create the most release friction.
Use review evidence to decide whether deeper governance, reporting, or automation should be prioritized.
The review produces table-ready approval evidence
| Signal | Example Evidence | Decision Use |
|---|---|---|
| Break/Fix | Version path, impacted pack, and release-note signal | Decide whether to approve, hold, or test deeper before update. |
| CVE Exposure | CVE ID, severity, source, affected pack, and remediation note | Prioritize critical and high findings before a maintenance window. |
| Audit Evidence | Run UUID, status, component, versions, and export-ready report | Attach the evidence to release, GRC, or stakeholder review. |
Short Intro to SOAR Pack Assurance Risk Management
Watch this short intro, then request a focused review for one pack, integration, or version path.
Built for teams responsible for secure, stable SOAR change
SOAR Pack Guardian helps SecOps, DevSecOps, QA, platform, release engineering, and governance teams work from the same risk picture before changes move into production.
SecOps / SOC
Prioritize exploitable pack and platform risk before changes increase exposure.
DevSecOps / QA
Use risk-scored pack insights to strengthen QA gates and release validation.
Platform / Release Engineering
Coordinate promotions across dev, QA, and production with greater confidence.
GRC / Leadership
Support audit readiness with evidence-backed, risk-based upgrade decisions.
See upgrade risk before it becomes production impact
Audit your current SOAR pack suite, understand dependency impact, and identify the risks most likely to delay upgrades, expand exposure, or trigger audit findings.
- 1 environment / instance assessment
- Pack inventory review and version normalization
- Compatibility review, CVE mapping, and prioritized findings
- Readiness report with gap analysis and recommended next steps
- Expert-guided readiness review session
Current-State Review
Create a clear inventory of integrations, playbooks, scripts, and layouts by pack and version so every team starts from the same source of truth.
Vulnerability and Compatibility Risk
Surface breaking changes, target-version gaps, and CVE exposure tied to specific packs and planned releases.
Release and Audit Reporting
Generate stakeholder-ready evidence for approvers, release managers, and auditors, with actionable remediation detail behind every decision.
New platform capabilities now included
Everything below is now available in the production workflow and built to support security operations, governance review, and executive communication from the same analysis run.
Stakeholder Report Templates
Purpose-built report views for CISO, GRC, IR, and SecOps with role-relevant summaries, detailed sections, and governance-focused columns.
Marketplace + Custom Object Intake
Single intake workflow that processes marketplace pack list uploads together with optional custom object archives (zip or gzip) for one unified analysis scope.
Run, Instance, and Column Filters
Filter every report by latest run, specific run, instance, status, severity, source scope, pack, and detailed column values for precise stakeholder segmentation.
Export-Ready Outputs
All report templates now support PDF (HTML print conversion), CSV, and JSON export formats for operational handoff, compliance evidence, and executive distribution.
Cross-Impact Lineage Diagrams
Interactive cross-impact views map command and object lineage from origin through every touchpoint (layouts, dashboards, incident types, results, and enrichment paths).
Custom Risk Fact Modeling
Custom pack comparison findings are persisted in dedicated analytics fact tables tied to customer, instance, run, and pack for repeatable downstream reporting.
NIST and MITRE Vector Coverage
Report headers and detailed sections now include cybersecurity vectors aligned to NIST CSF and MITRE ATT&CK for governance and incident-context traceability.
Feature tiers aligned to environment scope and operational demand
We scope each engagement based on instance count, run frequency, retention requirements, API/report usage, and compliance obligations.
- 1 environment / instance assessment
- Pack inventory review and version normalization
- Compatibility review, CVE mapping, and prioritized findings
- Readiness report with gap analysis and recommended next steps
- Expert-guided readiness review session
- 1 environment / instance
- Pack inventory review and version normalization
- Compatibility review and CVE risk summary
- Readiness report with prioritized findings
- Onboarding guidance and email support
- Everything in Readiness Snapshot
- 3 environments / instances
- Continuous monitoring and proactive alerting
- API intake, automation support, and automated notifications
- NIST CSF and MITRE ATT&CK aligned risk vectors in reporting
- Stakeholder reports for CISO, GRC, IR, and SecOps teams
- Audit-ready evidence, stakeholder reporting, and gap analysis
- Priority onboarding and support
- Everything in Continuous Assurance
- 15 environments / instances
- Multi-instance visibility and governance workflows
- Dedicated onboarding, premium support, and custom workflow alignment
- Advanced reporting, control mapping, and stakeholder alignment
- Custom deployment scope and tailored service delivery
How it works
Use the assets you already have in Cortex XSOAR, Cortex XSIAM, or Splunk SOAR and turn them into release-readiness signals for QA, security, and governance.
Your continuous assurance workflow
Start with manual uploads or automate collection through API, then turn the results into repeatable risk detection, prevention, audit readiness, and continuous monitoring.
This workflow connects intake, vulnerability visibility, upgrade governance, and proactive monitoring into one repeatable assurance model.